Lietuvos istorijos institutas

The aim of this article is to assess the value of Marija Alseikaitė-Gimbutienė’s (Gimbutas) 1946 dissertation published in Tübingen (Germany). It is also important to follow how much of an impact this work had on Lithuanian archaeology and what inspiration it may provide for scholars today. This paper concentrates on the parts of the book which deal with burial customs during the Roman Iron Age. Relevant problems of cultural divisions based on burial site types as per Gimbutienė are examined to see how much this classification may be accepted today. The second part of Gimbutienė’s dissertation, which focused on the meaning of burial customs, provides insights that are still important for scholarship today, and reveals the young scholar’s ability to reconstruct an old belief system and to discern the prospects for the further investigation of burial site material.

Disc brooches from the Roman Iron Age are very diverse in style and execution throughout Europe. Their diversity in the tarand cemetery areas of modern day Estonia and North Latvia is also very high, with many unique traits and some multidirectional infuences being observable. Therefore, regionality in the tarand cemetery areas will be studied through these diverse brooches in order to see whether some motifs, typological groups, or alloys were more preferred in some areas than in others. A typological and compositional approach has been adopted for this. Based on the distribution of certain groups of disc brooches, their surface treatment, and the direction of the infuences, two distinct areas can be seen: Northeast Estonia and Southeast Estonia–North Latvia. !e study shows how people in the tarand cemetery areas adopted foreign techniques and stylistic features in accordance with local preferences and used them in their local culture.