Lietuvos istorijos institutas

The article analyses the possibilities of using intrasite spatial analysis in Lithuanian Iron Age settlements. It notes the need, prior to an analysis, for identifying the formation processes of the archaeological context. Spatial analysis is the main method for identifying the structure of settlements, although disregarding the changes, which occurred during the formation processes, in the archaeological context usually leads to erroneous conclusions. All the material found at an archaeological site: both individual finds and mass material, is essential for identifying the formation processes, but the most crucial condition is their precise fixation during the excavation.

During 2009–2010, the Scientific Research Department of the State Cultural Reserve of Kernavė conducted a field survey in the Neris valley, mostly on the first terrace above the floodplain, in the Karmazinai, Grabijolai, and Kernavė regions. Exploratory test pits were excavated roughly every 50 m and in the wider valleys, in several rows. In this way a segment of river bank about 16.5 km long was investigated and 23 unenclosed settlements from various Iron Age periods were found. The article’s aim is an analysis of the Iron Age settlements discovered during 2009–2010 in the context of the other archaeological sites in the regions. It attempts, with the help of this research, to illustrate the main stages in the habitation of the Neris valley and to discover the special features of the development of the social landscape and the network of Iron Age settlements. It investigates the possible connection of the settlements with the existing burial sites, i.e. barrow cemeteries. It attempts to discover the change in the functional meaning of the hillforts during the various periods of the regions’ habitation. And it analyses the chronology, size, special features of the environment, and other questions about the discovered settlements.

The article analyses the structure of the archaeological Iron Age (1st–12th century) settlement at Kernavė. By analysing the settlement’s finds, cultural layer, and features, an effort was made to reveal what were the tendencies of their spatial distribution in the settlement and what information the remains of this material provides about the structure of the settlement that actually existed. After systemising the settlement’s material, concentrations, several tens of metres in diameter, of finds and features from separate periods were distinguished. These concentrations are located at a different place in each period. This shows that the archaeological settlement, which occupies a large area, was in fact inhabited sparsely and it appears that it was only separate single-residence farmsteads. These farmsteads did not stand in the same place the entire period of the settlement’s existence; at some interval they were moved a certain distance from the earlier location. The ‘movement’ of the farmsteads occurred within the boundaries of a defined territory, and an archaeological settlement much bigger in diameter gradually formed from the isolated small diameter concentrations within it. The analysis conducted here allows the likely locations of these farmsteads to be distinguished, but data about the structure and layout of these farmsteads is still greatly lacking.