Lietuvos archeologija

The article analyses the possibilities of using intrasite spatial analysis in Lithuanian Iron Age settlements. It notes the need, prior to an analysis, for identifying the formation processes of the archaeological context. Spatial analysis is the main method for identifying the structure of settlements, although disregarding the changes, which occurred during the formation processes, in the archaeological context usually leads to erroneous conclusions. All the material found at an archaeological site: both individual finds and mass material, is essential for identifying the formation processes, but the most crucial condition is their precise fixation during the excavation.

During 2009–2010, the Scientific Research Department of the State Cultural Reserve of Kernavė conducted a field survey in the Neris valley, mostly on the first terrace above the floodplain, in the Karmazinai, Grabijolai, and Kernavė regions. Exploratory test pits were excavated roughly every 50 m and in the wider valleys, in several rows. In this way a segment of river bank about 16.5 km long was investigated and 23 unenclosed settlements from various Iron Age periods were found. The article’s aim is an analysis of the Iron Age settlements discovered during 2009–2010 in the context of the other archaeological sites in the regions. It attempts, with the help of this research, to illustrate the main stages in the habitation of the Neris valley and to discover the special features of the development of the social landscape and the network of Iron Age settlements. It investigates the possible connection of the settlements with the existing burial sites, i.e. barrow cemeteries. It attempts to discover the change in the functional meaning of the hillforts during the various periods of the regions’ habitation. And it analyses the chronology, size, special features of the environment, and other questions about the discovered settlements.

The article presents a classification of the pottery dated to PIII–B2/C1 and a spatial analysis of the pottery, bone, and metal artefacts found at the Narkūnai archaeological complex (Utena District, Leliūnai Eldership). First, a re-examination of Narkūnai’s prehistoric chronology was made using typological studies. Second, on the basis of 14 879 analysed potsherds and 1534 separately examined rim sherds, pottery styles were distinguished in the context of the development of early hillforts’ pottery. Last, by applying a behavioural archaeology theory, the paper analyses the formation processes of the cultural layers and the fragment of the representativity of the archaeological context. A spatial analysis allowed the fragment of the 2nd century palaeorelief to be distinguished, the abandonment process of a single building to be examined, and four asynchronous metallurgical activity areas in the ‘Didysis’ Narkūnai Hillfort to be identified. The latter reflections on prehistoric behaviour are discussed in the context of the appearance and abandonment of the early hillforts and the relationship of the local communities with early metallurgy in the East Baltic region.